September 20, 2012
"In 2011, KFC introduced a 64 oz, $2.99 soft drink – a soft drink so big it needed a bucket handle – and vowed to donate $1 from each Pepsi purchased to the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation. Media outlets from Mother Jones to the SF Chronicle and The Atlantic decried the cruel irony of the promotion, listing the progression of soda sizes from the 1950s through to today, underscoring our ballooning caloric intake and skyrocketing obesity rates. But in the end-times era of capitalism, it should no longer come as a surprise that the reigning corpo-political oligarchs present us with combo meal solutions to the very problems they helped create."

adbusters (via theanxiousghost)

(via theamericanbear)

September 20, 2012
grandejouissance:

This is my depiction of Euan as a weasel. The resemblance is uncanny, isn’t it?

This is apparently an accurate reflection of how Tumblr sees me. Oh good. 
(Do I really look like a weasel?)

grandejouissance:

This is my depiction of Euan as a weasel. The resemblance is uncanny, isn’t it?

This is apparently an accurate reflection of how Tumblr sees me. Oh good. 

(Do I really look like a weasel?)

September 4, 2012
"Millions died, not outside the “modern world system,” but in the very process of being forcibly incorporated into its economic and political structures. They died in the golden age of Liberal Capitalism; indeed many were murdered by the theological application of the sacred principles of Smith, Bentham and Mill."

— Mike Davis, Late Victorian Holocausts.

July 6, 2012
"We must agree that war has been an indispensable feature of capitalist development."

— Rosa Luxemburg, Reform or Revolution (via antistate)

(via quotemarx)

June 17, 2012

Žižek at the RSA: First As Tragedy The Farce, 2009

In this video Žižek considers the development and effects of ethical capitalism. Very accessible by Žižek’s standards.

(Source: nolan-kane, via deliriouspointofview-deactivate)

June 17, 2012
"Capitalist democracy is a contradiction in terms, for it encapsulates two opposed systems. On the one hand there is capitalism, a system of economic organization that demands the existence of a relatively small class of people who own and control the main means of industrial, commercial, and financial activity, as well as a major part of the means of communication; these people thereby exercise a totally disproportionate amount of influence on politics and society both in their own countries and in lands far beyond their own borders. On the other hand there is democracy, which is based on the denial of such preponderance, and which requires a rough equality of condition that capitalism repudiates by its very nature. Domination and exploitation … are at the very core of capitalist democracy, and are inextricably linked to it."

— Ralph Miliband (via quotemarx)

May 25, 2012
"In Venezuela Chavez has made the co-ops a top political priority, giving them first refusal on government contracts and offering them economic incentives to trade with one another. By 2006, there were roughly 100,000 co-operatives in the country, employing more than 700,000 workers. Many are pieces of state infrastructure – toll booths, highway maintenance, health clinics – handed over to the communities to run. It’s a reverse of the logic of government outsourcing – rather than auctioning off pieces of the state to large corporations and losing democratic control, the people who use the resources are given the power to manage them, creating, at least in theory, both jobs and more responsive public services. Chavez’s many critics have derided these initiatives as handouts and unfair subsidies, of course. Yet in an era when Halliburton treats the U.S. government as its personal ATM for six years, withdraws upward of $20 billion in Iraq contracts alone, refuses to hire local workers either on the Gulf coast or in Iraq, then expresses its gratitude to U.S. taxpayers by moving its corporate headquarters to Dubai (with all the attendant tax and legal benefits), Chavez’s direct subsidies to regular people look significantly less radical."

— Naomi Klein (via fyeahnoamchomsky)

(Source: fidaiyin, via pieceinthepuzzlehumanity-deacti)

May 23, 2012
"Aside from some academics and members of the business community, the term neoliberalism is largely unknown and unused by the public at large, especially in the United States. There, to the contrary, neoliberal initiatives are characterized as free market policies that encourage private enterprise and consumer choice, reward personal responsibility and entrepreneurial initiative, and undermine the dead hand of the incompetent, bureaucratic, and parasitic government, which can never do good (even when well intentioned, which it rarely is). A generation of corporate-financed public relations efforts has given these terms and ideas a near-sacred aura. As a result, these phrases and the claims they imply rarely require empirical defense, and are invoked to rationalize anything from lowering taxes on the wealthy and scrapping environmental regulations to dismantling public education and social welfare programs. Indeed, any activity that might interfere with corporate domination of society is automatically suspect because it would impede the workings of the free market, which is advanced as the only rational, fair, and democratic allocator of goods and services. At their most eloquent, proponents of neoliberalism sound as if they are doing poor people, the environment, and everybody else a tremendous service as they enact policies on behalf of the wealthy few."

Noam Chomsky and the Struggle Against Neoliberalism 

(Source: fidaiyin, via pieceinthepuzzlehumanity-deacti)

May 20, 2012
max553:

Capitalism.

Class Relations, taken from Das Kapital — The Illustrated Edition

max553:

Capitalism.

Class Relations, taken from Das Kapital — The Illustrated Edition

8:27pm  |   URL: http://tmblr.co/ZDZu3yLqcuRJ
  
Filed under: Capitalism Politics 
April 25, 2012

bbthity:

G.A. Cohen on Inequality of Wealth

Can an egalitarian be rich without being guilty of hypocrisy? How should we think about wealth and inequality? G.A.Cohen, author of a book with the provocative title If You’re An Egalitarian, How Come Your’e So Rich? addresses these questions in this episode of Philosophy Bites.

(via grandejouissance)